Category: wtville weekly chronicle
He’s not well, you know …
I have a dream …
The Weekly Grift – Episode 1257
The Never Surrender High-Tops
Meet The Never Surrender High-Tops. Only 1000 pairs will ever be released. Each pair is numbered. A truly worthless βcollector’s itemβ. The First Official Sneaker by President Trump, released by Sneaker Cons LTD., a division of PutinCorp.
Bold, gold, and strong, just like the Russian hooker urine disgraced ex-president Trump loves so much.
They’re for the go-getters who don’t know or understand the word grift. With a standout gold finish and the ‘T’ (for Traitor) badge, these kicks, as the kids in the hood call them, are for true incel warriors and Meal Team Sicks wannabes. Wrapped with an American flag on the collar so as to pretend to give a flying fuck about this shithole country, they shout out to the fans of βthe peeβ. The Never Surrender sneakers, named after my most recent surrender (many more to follow, watch this site for weekly grifts), are my latest con in shoe form. Lace-up and step out of that basement suite at nanas. With only 1000 pairs ever to be released, Grab Your Limited Edition Pair Now. The Never Surrender High Tops are estimated to ship in July 2047.
Free shipping on orders over $453,000,000!
People who bought the above line of crap may also like these fine Trump products, which may also one day become reality. MAY.
Here come the carrot ferrets!
Skellvis
Daily reminder …
Oh, FFS! SHUT. THE. FUCK. UP!
CALLING ALL TRAITORS!!!
βBring out your brain dead! Bring out your brain dead!β
Yo! MAGA!
Yerβ boi is havinβ another racist, lie-brag filled skeezfest/display of desperate impotence and victimhood! He gunna whine like the pussy ass bitch he is, with ALL the hits!
βBuild the wall!β βLock them up!β βI DONβT shit my diaper!β βItβs NOT a mushroom!β βIβm not really into golden showers.β and all your faves. Listen up Cletus, itβs time to git yerβ angry, unemployed, incel ass down to whatever fuckinβ field heβs not gunna pay the rent on this weekend and get that man some of yerβ hard earned cash! Heβs broker than Kid Rockβs career and needs all the Rubles he can grift! That Top Secret dox money only went so far, yaβ know. So go grab sister-cousin to sell some of her meth stash, take in the empties, and letβs buy some fuckinβ hats, k, Billy-Joe-Ray-Bob? The βbillionaireβ needs that $45, bad.
That Smell …
Ooh that smell
Can’t you smell that smell
Ooh that smell
The smell of death surrounds you β¦
– Lynyrd Skynyrd
@realDonaldTrump , seen here, crapping his diaper, again, as he leaves Maralagofuckyerself on his way to lie-brag and whine at his latest rubefest.
God made what???
So, in a move that was, I guess, to be expected, Scumbag/traitor/tiny penis enthusiast, Donald J. (Jobless) Trump releses a video β¦
and trust me, itβs as fucked up as it sounds β¦ 40 something minutes of lies, blasphemy and just plain idiocy that seem to have landed squarely in the Jim Jones βHey, who wants Kool-Aid??β zone.
Now, Iβm an atheist and even I get this is nonsense and grifting β¦
unfortunately millions wonβt β¦ and these fuckers are gunna vote, so, yβall better get off yerβ asses, put down the fkn lattes and GOTV!!
NOPE!
If there was a God, she sure as fuck wouldnβt do this.
Shocked, I tell ya’, shocked!
BREAKING: Trumpβs businesses received $7.8 million from 20 foreign governments during his presidency, according to documents released by Democrats on Thursday.
Most of the monies came from or through China which is, coincidentally*, exactly what the GOP is accusing Biden of. Oops!
* as in βno fucking way it happenedβ
also see: gaslighting, bullshit, propaganda, GOP and traitors
St. Elmo’s Fire
Karma Update:
Take that stank to the bank!
Know Yer’ GOP – Cancun Nights Edition
Rafael Edward Cruz (/kru:z/; born December 22, 1970) is a Canadian born,
pretend-American politician and pseudo-Nazi propagandist pretending to serve as
the junior United States Senator for Texas. He was the runner-up for the
Republican presidential nomination in the 2016 election, proving once and for all that only black Democrats need to be born in the United States to be president.
Ted is an avid Pornhub enthusiast and has been known to spend long evenings at
the office ‘tucking in his shirt’, often several times in an evening. Like I said, avid.
Ted is also a bloviating coward/phone banker (ask Fat Donnie and Heidi) and a
compulsive liar who never met a dollar he wouldn’t swallow for. (again, ask Fat
Donnie and Heidi). Ted has no friends because he’s a caustic, self-serving prick and because with all those βlate shiftsβ, no-one ever wants to get very close. Often seen in the proximity of
Rudy 911iani, Russian oligarchs, a certain traitor known as βthe βShroomβ, and pretty much anyone with a buck.
Know Yer’ GOP 069 of β
If it walks like a clown, and talks like a clown …
Then it must be the GOP impeachment team.
And nobody even got a damn hummer this time.
Here we go again, America.
Fuck these guys!
Vote every last one of these clowns out at the first opportunity.
Literally, the entire planet is counting on it.
James βChucklefuckβ Comer (left) seen here discussing the Biden Impeachment plans with renowned Ohio pedo enabler Jim βthe Shower Kingβ Jordan.
The more things change …
I donβt like to repost my own posts, but I just was cleaning up my drive and found this piece from nearly a decade ago, and man, does it ever seem like weβre βthereβ now β¦ kinda fkn scary actually Now that MAGA Mike the Bible Humper is second in line to the most powerful job on the planet.
It was well worth the read then, and I think itβs probably even more so now.
like sharia law, but american, so itβs okay β¦
PUBLISHED ON July 8, 2014
following is a post from slate.com β¦
it is a little long, but important, and so very much worth the read β¦
This is a religious civil war: Hobby Lobby only the beginning for new religious theocrats
The Tea Party controls the House. Religious extremists run the Supreme Court. Weβre approaching a very scary time
Paul Rosenberg
The United States is still a democratic republic, formally, but what that actually means in practice is increasingly in doubt β and the Hobby Lobby ruling, deeply disingenuous and sharply at odds with centuries of Anglo-American law, exemplifies how that formal reality is increasingly mocked in practice. It is a practice best described as neo-feudalism, taking power away from ordinary citizens, in all their pluralistic, idiosyncratic diversity, and handing it over to corporations and religious dictators in both the public and the private realm. The Supreme Courtβs actions are not taking place in a vacuum β though they are filling one: As Tea Party Republicans in the House increasingly bring democratic self-government to a halt, contracting the power of we the people to act as a cohesive self-governing whole, the Supreme Courtβs conservative majority shifts ever more everyday power into the hands of private dictatorships.
Hobby Lobby handed for-profit corporations religious rights for the first time in history β a radical break with all previous precedent, and yet a part of a recent pattern, as Norm Ornstein rightly pointed out: [F]or the majority on the Roberts Court, through a series of rulings that favor corporations over labor or other interests, it is clear that corporations are king, superior to individual Americansβwith all the special treatment in taxes and protection from legal liability that are unavailable to us individuals, and now all the extra benefits that come with individual citizenship. Call it the new Crony Capitalism.
The expansion of corporate power in Hobby Lobby has gotten too little attention, and Iβll return to discuss this further below. But the advancement of theocracy β religious dictatorship β is even less clearly seen through the fog of right-wing propaganda about βreligious liberty.β
First, however, an important highlight of a neglected aspect of the Hobby Lobby case, the fact that Hobby Lobbyβs self-professed belief appeared out of nowhere just in time for them to file suit, as Stephanie Mencimer noted in March: The company admits in its complaint that until it considered filing the suit in 2012, its generous health insurance plan actually covered Plan B and Ella (though not IUDs). The burden of this coverage was apparently so insignificant that God, and Hobby Lobby executives, never noticed it until the mandate became a political issue.
In short, Hobby Lobbyβs βdeeply held beliefsβ claims are transparently bogus β as well as being scientifically invalid, since none of the methods involved are abortifacients, as Hobby Lobby claims. These would not matter if they only guided individual private conduct; thatβs precisely what religious freedom actually means. Youβre free to be a religious hypocrite, because letting someone else judge your sincerity can lead too easily to real religious tyranny. But when youβre already in a position to tyrannize others β as Hobby Lobby is β thatβs a whole different ballgame. The tyrantβs freedom is everyone elseβs slavery.
Historically, theocracy meant top-down religiously sanctioned dictatorship, exemplified in Western history by the divine right of kings philosophy. No one reads John Lockeβs βFirst Treatise on Civil Governmentβ anymore, because it is a refutation of the divine right of kings β one might as well read a refutation of four element theory in physics class. Lockeβs βSecond Treatiseβ provided a sharply contrasted legitimate foundation for civil government β the social contract and the consent of the governed. This is the air we breathe, and have been breathing ever since America was born.
And yet, theocracy and democracy are not two utterly distinct phenomena. Theocracy can well hold sway inside the family, for example, while the larger society retains its democratic form. More to the point, one stream of extreme Christian theocratic thinking β the dominion theology of the New Apostolic Reformation β has no problem (initially, at least) assimilating its goals of a theocratic government with the existing two-party electoral system. As researcher Rachel Tabachnick explains: Instead of escaping the earth (in the Rapture)* prior to the turmoil of the end times, they [the NAR] teach that believers will defeat evil by taking dominion, or control, over all sectors of society and government, resulting in mass conversions to their brand of Charismatic evangelicalism and a Christian utopia or βKingdomβ on earth.
In early 2010, a leading NAR figure, Edgardo Silvoso, founder of International Transformation Network, which played a major role in promoting and passing Ugandaβs anti-gay legislation, confidently said, βIt doesnβt matter if the Republican or the Democratic candidate wins the governorship [of Hawaii]. Either one is already in the kingdom.β It didnβt turn out that way, because Neil Abercrombie, Hawaiiβs popular long-term U.S. representative, defeated both the NAR-supported candidates β one in the Democratic primary, the other in the general election. Still, Silvosoβs vision might have come true, there could have been a contested two-party election in which both candidates were Christian dominionists β and most in the media (and thereby the public) wouldnβt even have known what was going on.
Sarah Palin was the NARβs first full-throated state governor (revealing videos here), but Rick Perry has strong NAR connections as well β the religious kickoff to his 2012 presidential campaign was entirely an NAR-run event. But the point here is a broader one: The dividing line between theocracy and a democratic republic is not nearly as sharp as most might suppose, in fact, there may not actually be such a line, only a zone of blurriness for everything involved.
While the NAR represents an international evangelical grass-roots force of remarkable power for how little press attention it has gained, the theocratic push from above in America β duplicity framed in terms of βreligious libertyβ β comes from a Catholic/Protestant alliance forged in antiabortion political battles of the past 30-plus years, which is also under covered and poorly understood in the mainstream corporate media, despite being grounded in a phalanx of powerful organizations, from the high-profile Family Research Council and the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, through more specialized think tanks and legal advocacy organizations, such as the Becket Fund and the Alliance Defending Freedom. A useful reference is βRedefining Religious Liberty: The Covert Campaign Against Civil Rightsβ by Jay Michaelson, published by Political Research Associates in March 2013. In it, he writes: While the religious liberty debate is a growing front in the ongoing culture wars, it is actually an old argument repurposed for a new context. In the postwar era, the Christian Right defended racial segregation, school prayer, public religious displays, and other religious practices that infringed on the liberties of others by claiming that restrictions on such public acts infringed upon their religious liberty. Then as now, the Christian Right turned antidiscrimination arguments on their heads: instead of African Americans being discriminated against by segregated Christian universities, the universities were being discriminated against by not being allowed to exclude them; instead of public prayers oppressing religious minorities, Christians are being oppressed by not being able to offer them.
In the βreligious libertyβ framework, the Christian Right attacks access to contraception, access to abortion, same-sex marriage, and antidiscrimination lawsβnot on moral grounds (e.g., that contraception is morally wrong or that LGBTQ rights violate βfamily valuesβ) but because they allegedly impinge upon the religious freedoms of others (e.g., by forcing employers to violate their religion by providing contraception coverage)β¦.
In fact, there is not a single βreligious libertyβ claim that does not involve abridging someone elseβs rights.
As Iβve already indicated, Hobby Lobbyβs βdeeply held beliefsβ claims are transparently bogus, but this need not always be the case. What is the case is that the inversion Michaelson describes β that of turning anti-discrimination arguments on their heads β both derives from and contributes to states of confusion in which all manner of bogus claims may flourish. As I noted above, there are legitimate reasons why the content of religious beliefs should not be scrutinized when considering questions of free exercise. But when religion is being imposed upon others, the presumptions ought to be reversed; we ought to be extremely reluctant to allow anyone to impose their religious beliefs on anyone else, no matter how light or innocent that imposition might be claimed to be. The views themselves as well as the manner they are imposed on others ought to be scrutinized as rigorously as possible. Donβt want your religious beliefs questioned? Then donβt impose them on others. When push comes to shove, real religious freedom can be just as simple as that.
And the phony βreligious freedomβ crowd knows it, which helps explain why outright lies repeatedly slip into their arguments, as Michaelsonβs report makes clear. For example, anti-gay βreligious freedomβ advocates routinely repeat the lie that legalizing same-sex marriage means forcing churches to perform same-sex wedding ceremonies against their will β a flat-out lie.
Legalized civil divorce did not force the Catholic Church to marry divorced individuals, and legalized same-sex marriage would not force them to marry gay individuals, either. Institutional religious practice is almost entirely insulated from civil law. What does change are the rules applying to society at large. Michaelson explains:
Typically, there are five tiers of actors:
1. Churches, clergy, and religious institutions
2. Religious organizations
3. Religiously affiliated organizations
4. Religiously owned businesses
5. Religious individuals
The law treats these tiers differently: churches are rarely required to obey antidiscrimination laws, for example, but religious organizations may be, and religious-owned businesses are. Conservative βreligious libertyβ rhetoric deliberately misstates harms upward, and tactically expands exemptions downward. On the one side, no clergy will ever have to solemnize any marriage against her/his beliefs, yet restrictions on tier 4 or 5 individuals are cynically extended by conservative messaging to tier 1.
Michaelson then addresses the context of the Hobby Lobby case: On the other side, conservative βreligious libertyβ advocates are clearly pursuing a staged plan to migrate extensions downward. In the current HHS benefit battle, for example, the Obama administration first exempted tiers 1 and 2, and then, in February 2013, exempted tier 3. Yet still the Becket Fund has objected that βmillions of Americansββi.e., tiers 4 and 5βare still unprotected.
And this is precisely the logic that the Hobby Lobby decision pursued. The Obama administrationβs exemptions of Tiers 1 and 2 were not seen as signs of respect for religious liberty, in line with traditional practice, nor was its further exemption of Tier 3 seen as going the extra mile in a spirit of conciliation. Instead, the accommodation made for Tier 3 was used by Justice Alito to argue for similar treatment for Tier 4. The end result is that women in more than half the nationβs workforce can now be deprived by their employers of their most basic reproductive rights, involving birth control, not abortion.
But thatβs just one side of the story. Thereβs also the economic, corporate power side, where things are a bit more complicated. I quoted above from Norm Ornstein, making the point that Hobby Lobby was part of a broader pattern of shifting power into corporate hands. But itβs striking that the U.S. Chamber of Commerce did not weigh in on the Hobby Lobby Case β it produced no amicus brief. In fact, as noted by David H. Gans of the Constitutional Accountability Center, βthe only noteworthy corporate voices to weigh in β the U.S. Womenβs Chamber of Commerce and the National Gay and Lesbian Chamber of Commerce β actually came down against them [Hobby Lobby and its supporters].β Gans also notes another brief from dozens of corporate and criminal law professors, βwho argued that Hobby Lobbyβs argument would eviscerate the fabric of corporate law, undercutting the corporate veil that protects owners and shareholders from liability for the actions of the corporation.β The brief itself begins laying out its argument thus: Hobby Lobby and Conestoga each asserts that the religious values of its present controlling shareholders should pass through to the corporation itself. This Court should reject any such βvalues pass-throughβ concept. To do otherwise would run contrary to established principles of corporate law.
The essence of a corporation is its βseparatenessβ from its shareholders. It is a distinct legal entity, with its own rights and obligations, different from the rights and obligations of its shareholders. This Court has repeatedly recognized this separateness.
This is yet another indication of how radically the Hobby Lobby decision departs from the existing fabric of Anglo-American law. And yet, there are clearly some in the corporate world who welcome this development, and itβs surely no accident that the same five justices produced both Hobby Lobby and Citizens United. So whatβs going on here?
The best answer I know of comes from political scientist Corey Robin, and it involves looking much deeper than the framework of corporate law. The day the decision came down, Robin published βA Readerβs Guide to Hobby Lobby,β listing what he called βa few posts Iβve written over the years that should help put the Supreme Courtβs decision in theoretical and historical perspective.β Theyβre all well worth reading, but I want to focus on just one of them, the first of two that Robin described thus:
β¦ Second, two posts on free-market types and birth control, how even the most libertarian-ish free-wheeler seeks to control womenβs bodies: Love For Sale: Birth Control from Marx to Mises and Probing Tyler Cowen: When Libertarians Get Medieval on Your Vagina.
In βLove for Sale,β Robin discusses Ludwig von Misesβ classic 1922 text βSocialism,β and some contemporary discussions concerning it, particularly its fourth chapter, βThe Social Order and the Family.β Here is where Robin gets to the heart of the matter: The real reason Misesβs arguments about women are so relevant, it seems to me, is that in the course of making them he reveals something larger about the libertarian worldview: libertarianism is not about liberty at all, or at least not about liberty for everyone. In fact, itβs the opposite.
Hereβs Mises describing the socialist program of βfree loveβ:
Free love is the socialistsβ radical solution for sexual problems. The socialistic society abolishes the economic dependence of woman which results from the fact that woman is dependent on the income of her husband. Man and woman have the same economic rights and the same duties, as far as motherhood does not demand special consideration for the women. Public funds provide for the maintenance and education of the children, which are no longer the affairs of the parents but of society. Thus the relations between the sexes are no longer influenced by social and economic conditionsβ¦.The family disappears and society is confronted with separate individuals only. Choice in love becomes completely free.
Sounds like a libertarian paradise, right? Society is dissolved into atomistic individuals, obstacles to our free choices are removed, everyone has the same rights and duties. But Mises is not celebrating this ideal; heβs criticizing it. Not because it makes people unfree but because it makes people β specifically, women β free. The problem with liberating women from the constraints of βsocial and economic conditionsβ is that β¦ women are liberated from the constraints of social and economic conditions.
If you want to know why libertarians reflexively embrace the National Rifle Associationβs vision of freedom, but not Planned Parenthoodβs (contrasting visions I discussed here), you need look no further. This passage also helps explain why thereβs at least a germ of historical sense in the otherwise ridiculous Tea Party accusation that Obama is a βsocialistβ! By using government to empower women to make their own reproductive choices β not just in theory, but for real β Obamacareβs reproductive healthcare mandate really is acting in the socialist spirit as Mises described it, however market-based the mechanisms involved may be.
But itβs worth lingering a bit further with the socialist vision as Mises describes it, because it is so intimately bound up in what a functioning democratic republic actually does, or at least has the potential to do, when, for example, we take the Constitutionβs general welfare clause seriously. What the socialists want, Mises argues, is to eliminate all manner of βnatural inequalitiesβ. This would, ironically, make everyoneβnot just privileged, straight, white males of means β into classic libertarian subjects, exercising their own, individual, unconstrained and uncoerced free choice. And this is the very last thing that libertarians actually want.
This helps explain why, for example, todayβs Tea Party Republicans reject unemployment insurance as βsocialistβ β if someone out of work has any freedom at all to hold out for a job that will cover their mortgage, say, thatβs socialism as Mises would describe it. And he has a point: socialism really is just another word for collectively removing the hidden and semi-hidden forms of coercion that otherwise shape and control our everyday lives. Thatβs why public education is socialist, too β and why Democratic politicians as well as Republicans are so eager to destroy it nowadays. But none of these other examples is quite as visceral or far-reaching as that of giving women reproductive autonomy equal to that of men.
This, then, is the bottom line: Conservatives (including libertarians) stand for the preservation and reinforcement (if necessary) of purportedly βnaturalβ inequalities, which automatically structure all of society into overlapping forms of dominance and submission, in which the vast majority of people are inherently unfree βby nature.β Any collective action taken to free people from such dependent, powerless living conditions is anathema to them. Democracy itself is anathema to them. And Hobby Lobby is just the latest signal that they are firmly in charge.
Do they contradict themselves? Of course! So what? Do facts or logic matter anymore? Donβt be ridiculous! Dictatorship means never having to say youβre sorry β much less even a teensy bit wrong. The damages done to the structure and logic of corporate law? Irrelevant!
At the beginning, I wrote, βThe United States is still a democratic republic, formally, but what that actually means in practice is increasingly in doubt.β This doubt can simply be summarized in the fact that any action to promote the general welfare will be automatically blocked and denounced as βsocialismβ by Tea Party Republicans in the House, while at the same time, the 5-4 conservative majority in the Supreme Court rewrites decades or centuries of precedent to further empower the most powerful elements in our society, to the ever-deepening detriment of the whole.
Paul Rosenberg is a California-based writer/activist, senior editor for Random Lengths News, and a columnist for Al Jazeera English. Follow him on Twitter at @PaulHRosenberg.
reposted from Salon.com MORE from Paul Rose Rosenberg Here β¦
“So much chinning …”
Dear Canada;
Liberty Biberty
Know Yer’ GQP …. GOPsies, Trumps and Thieves Edition
NEXT!!!
Now that Felicia Santos has been removed from the trough and kicked to the curb, my money is that next up is Matty the underage female enthusiast/Venmo master, and that Qev MacCarthyβs Pissy Bois gang will run him off the hill shortly β¦ fingers crossed, huh?
Then, Iβm givinβ even money that oleβ QevMac says βFUCK ALL, YβALL!!!β to the GQP and quits on them in a huff, as Qev is wont to do, leaving them with a razor thin majority and total fkn chaos β¦ as usual.
Canβt wait! </s>
“COWARD DOWN!!! COWARD DOWN!!!
NEW! at the Trump Store
“Once more unto the breach, dear friends, once more”
or βHere we go again, with the fuckinβ dimbulb patrol! Fuck me!!!β
Danielle Smith (in red, of course) seen here doing what she does best β¦ being an out of touch, reality denying grifter and Scump wannabe.
Okay kids, buckle the fuck up!
Here we go again.
Yep, COVIDβs back, and the RWNJβs that run this province have decided that less science (but hey donβt worry, science is still ok, kinda, just not too much of it), and a little more Jeebus, βalternative theoriesβ and βan opening up of the types of treatmentsβ are where Danielle the MAGAt wannabe Smith is taking her cues in case of any future βhealth issuesβ β¦ oh yeah, and she and her buds, and ONLY they, will decide on everything that concerns said future (like now) βhealth issuesβ. Who needs science when thereβs money to be made.
Alberta COVID-19 panel urges consideration of ‘alternative’ scientific theories
911iani, The Movie
From the bigoted, homophobic, treasonous douchenozzle that brought yaβ βmen are disposableβ, βcollusion is not a crimeβ, βtruth isnβt truthβ, βWelcome everyone, to the Four Seasonsβ and βJewish men have small cocksβ, now we get the inside scoop on what makes Rudy βAmericaβs Nightmayorβ in a story so predictable, so dumb and so larcenous that it could only be about Scump sycophant Rudy βthe shirt tuckerβ Giuliani β¦
Some violence, nudity, gay penetrative but consensual sex, βwater sportsβ, treason, doucherocketry, racism and strong language.
65+ Farce/Tragedy/Horror/SciFi/Adult
Warning: some pretty skeezy shit here, so set those PVRβs kids.
Ass Clown Moments From the Hill
Todayβs GOP β βWeβll bite your dick, if given the chance.β
You canβt make this shit up β¦
U.S. Senator Markwayne Mullin rose from his seat and challenged Teamsters President Sean O’Brien to a fight, before the committee chair stepped in defuse the confrontation.
The verbal sparring began after Mullin, an Oklahoma Republican, paraphrased from a June tweet posted by O’Brien about the senator: “What a clown, a fraud. Always has been, always will be. Quit the tough guy act in these Senate hearings. You know where to find me. Any place, anytime cowboy.”
After yesterdayβs antics on the hill, we get this β¦
On a RWNJ/MAGAt βpretend radio show, the clown show rolls onward and downward.
Markwayne Mullin: And by the way, Iβm not afraid of biting. I will bite.
Q: Biting? Mullin: Iβll bite 100%. In a fight, Iβm gonna bite. Iβll do anything. Iβm not above it. And I donβt care where I bite by the way.
The Vermin King
Borrowing lines from Mussolini and Hitler and adopting a βtude from Pol Pot, βSoon-to-be-fucked-Florida- Manβ summons his full Fascist/Nazi this weekend at his Gravy Seals rallies.
Be afraid America, be very afraid.
Heβs fkn serious about this stuff, and his idiots WILL vote!
Trumpβs Threat to Handle the βVerminβ Is Straight Out of the Nazi Playbook
On Saturday at 10:25 a.m., he posted on Truth Social: βIn honor of our great Veterans on Veteranβs Day, we pledge to you that we will root out the Communists, Marxists, Fascists, and Radical Left Thugs that live like vermin within the confines of our country, lie, steal, and cheat on Elections, and will do anything possible, whether legally or illegally, to destroy America, and the American dream.β Then, at a rally in New Hampshire later that day, he repeated those words essentially verbatim, promising to βroot out the radical left thugs that live like vermin within the confines of our countryβ, and then doubled down on it: βThe real threat is not from the radical right, the real threat is from the radical left, and itβs growing every day, every single day. The threat from outside forces is far less sinister, dangerous, and grave than the threat from within. Our threat is from within.β
Fuck this guy!
Heβs a Nazi in every fkn sense of the word. Aim higher, America.